Menu

A+ A A-

Download article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2019.3.81

Pimanov S.I., Bondarenko V.M., Makarenko E.V.
Two-dimentional shear wave ultrasound elastography of the perirenal visceral adipose tissue in patients with metabolic syndrome
Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University, Vitebsk, Republic of Belarus

Vestnik VGMU. 2019;18(3):81-88.

Abstract.
Objectives. To evaluate the parameters of  two-dimensional shear wave ultrasound elastography (2D-SWE) of the bottom perirenal visceral adipose tissue (BPVAT) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) and in healthy individuals, as well as to study the effect of the patients’ age on the elastographic characteristics of  the BPVAT.
Material and methods. 49 patients, including 20 men and 29 women, were enrolled in this study. The average age of the patients was (M±σ) 42.56±6.56 years. The group of patients with MS consisted of 34 persons  aged 42.19 ± 6.28 years, and the control group consisted of 15 healthy individuals whose age was 42.67 ± 7.40 years (p = 0.790). The study design was cross-sectional. The diagnosis of MS was based on the conventional international criteria. Ultrasound (US) examination was performed using a Logiq E9 (GE Healthcare, USA) ultrasound system with a convex broadband probe (C1-6D). The area of the BPVAT was determined on the right side by means of  the method described earlier. 2D-SWE of the BPVAT was performed in the original modification, based on the conventional 2D-SWE method of the liver stiffness evaluation  for non-invasive assessment of the  fibrosis stage. The Young’s modulus (elastic modulus, stiffness) was expressed in kilopascals (kPa).
Results. The Young’s modulus of the  BPVAT in patients with MS made up  5.86 ± 2.20 kPa, and in the control group it was 3.81 ± 1.27 kPa, p = 0.002. There was no statistically significant correlation with age (r = 0.248; p = 0.158), weight (r = 0.337; p = 0.051) and the BPVAT.  Moderate correlation between stiffness of the BPVAT and body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.565; p <0.001), the absence of a statistically significant correlation with age (r = 0.248; p = 0.158), weight (r = 0.337; p = 0.051) and the BPVAT area (r = 0.183; p = 0.301) were found. In the control group there was no correlation with age (r = 0.430; p = 0.110), weight (r = –0.298; p = 0.281), BMI (r = 0.201; p = 0.474) and the BPVAT area (r = –0.377; p = 0.166 ).
Conclusions. The stiffness of the  BPVAT in patients with MS was statistically significantly higher than that in healthy individuals. There was no association between the elastic modulus of the  BPVAT and the age of both patients with MS and  healthy individuals.  The Young’s modulus value of the BPVAT in patients with MS correlates with that of  BMI. No correlation was found between the elastic modulus and the surface area of  the BPVAT to the right.
Key words: perirenal visceral adipose tissue, ultrasound investigation, elastography, shear wave, metabolic syndrome.

References

1. Gonçalves CG, Glade MJ, Meguid MM. Metabolically healthy obese individuals: Key protective factors. Nutrition. 2016 Jan;32(1):14-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2015.07.010  
2. Roever L, Resende ES, Veloso FC, Diniz AL, Penha-Silva N, Casella-Filho A, et al. Perirenal Fat and Association With Metabolic Risk Factors: The Uberlândia Heart Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(38):e1105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001105
3. Bondarenko VM, Marchuk VP, Pimanov SI, Mikhaylova NA, Makarenko EV. Correlation of visceral fat tissue content according to CT data with anthropometric parameters and ultrasound results. Vestn VGMU. 2012;11(1):157-65. (In Russ.)
4. Pimanov SI, Bondarenko VM, Marchuk VP, Mikhaylova NA, Sapego AL, Makarenko EV. Evaluation of the results of measurement of visceral fat tissue amount in ultrasound and computed tomography. Ul'trazvukovaia Funktsional Diagnostika. 2016;(4):59-72. (In Russ.)
5. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 May;41(5):1126-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.009
6. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics. 2017 Mar;7(5):1303-1329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.18650  
7. Schellhaas B, Strobel D, Wildner D, Goertz RS, Neurath MF, Pfeifer L. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography: a new method comparable to acoustic radiation force impulse imaging? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;29(6):723-729. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000846
8. Takahashi H, Ono N, Eguchi Y, Eguchi T, Kitajima Y, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for fibrosis staging of chronic liver disease: a pilot study. Liver Int. 2010 Apr;30(4):538-45. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02130.x  
9. Sherratt MJ. Age-Related Tissue Stiffening: Cause and Effect. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Feb;2(1):11-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2011.0328
10. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009 Oct;120(16):1640-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644
11. Ferraioli G, Wong VW, Castera L, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Dietrich CF, et al. Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicineand Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Dec;44(12):2419-2440. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.008
12. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
13. Samani A, Zubovits J, Plewes D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-basedinvestigation of 169 samples. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar;52(6):1565-76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/002
14. Blüher M. Adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009 Jun;117(6):241-50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1192044  
15. Spalding KL, Arner E, Westermark PO, Bernard S, Buchholz BA, Bergmann O, et al. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature. 2008 Jun;453(7196):783-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06902  
16. Crewe C, An YA, Scherer PE. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2017 Jan;127(1):74-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI88883   
17. Marcelin G, Ferreira A, Liu Y, Atlan M, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Pelloux V, et al. A PDGFRα-Mediated Switch toward CD9high Adipocyte Progenitors Controls Obesity-Induced Adipose Tissue Fibrosis. Cell Metab. 2017 Mar 7;25(3):673-685. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.010  
18. Engin A. Adipose Tissue Hypoxia in Obesity and Its Impact on Preadipocytes and Macrophages: Hypoxia Hypothesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;960:305-326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_13
19. Bremer AA, Devaraj S, Afify A, Jialal I. Adipose tissue dysregulation in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Nov;96(11):E1782-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1577  
20. Phillips CM, Perry IJ. Does inflammation determine metabolic health status in obese and nonobese adults? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Oct;98(10):E1610-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2038  
21. Khan T, Muise ES, Iyengar P, Wang ZV, Chandalia M, Abate N, et al. Metabolic dysregulation and adipose tissue fibrosis: role of collagen VI. Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Mar;29(6):1575-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01300-08

Information about authors:
Pimanov S.I. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor, head of the Chair of Internal Medicine No.2 of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining, Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University;
Bondarenko V.M. – postgraduate of the Chair of Internal Medicine No.2 of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining, senior lecturer of the Chair of Hospital Surgery with the courses of Urology & Pediatric Surgery, Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University;
Makarenko E.V. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor of the Chair of Internal Medicine No.2 of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining, Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University.

Correspondence address: Republic of Belarus, 210009, Vitebsk, 27 Frunze ave., Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University, Chair of Internal Medicine No.2 of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining. E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. – Sergey I. Pimanov.

Поиск по сайту