Menu

A+ A A-

Download article

Frolova A.V., Kosinets A.N., Okulich V.K.
Wound infection. State of the problem

Abstract.
The etiological structure of purulent-inflammatory wound healing process of different localization has been studied. It has been found that for all the species diversity of the wound microflora the dominant role in the occurrence and development of purulent-inflammatory diseases and complications in surgery and otorhinolaryngology is played by gram-positive microorganisms, represented mainly by staphylococci. Despite the prevalence of Str. pyogenes in inoculations from the pharynx in peritonsillitis, the relatively high incidence of S. aureus can be regarded as an etiological risk factor of the process chronicity. In purulent-inflammatory processes in the middle ear the expediency of microbiological examination of a wound discharge from the tympanic cavity has been demonstrated. All selected strains of the causative agents possess multidrug resistance to antibiotics. It has been found that the species composition of the causative agents and their biological properties (pathogenic and persistence potential), antimicrobial resistance determine the variety of clinical forms of the surgical infection. The protracted nature of purulent-inflammatory process of any localization is due to the high level of antilysozyme activity of the pathogen contributing to its long-term persistence in the body. Correlation between the expression level of antilysozyme activity of staphylococci and their antibiotic resistance (r=0,85, p<0,01) has been found out. At the same time in all types of this pathology higher antilysozyme activity in gram-negative bacteria compared to that in gram-positive ones has been observed that correlates with the symptoms of the diseases caused by them. It has been suggested to perform the microbiological monitoring of the air in the surgical departments to exclude the possibility of the exogenous infecting of the wound surface.
Key words: wound infection, etiology, biological properties, resistance.

References

1.    Abaev YuK. Sovremennye osobennosti khirurgicheskoi infektsii [Modern features of a surgical infection]. Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova. 2005;164(3):107-11.
2.    Shinagawa N, Takayama T, Kato K, Hirata K, Katsuramaki T, Mukaiya M, Sato T, Ushijima Y, Ushida T, Yura J, Aikawa N, Sekine K, Manabe T, Takeyama H, Hasegawa M, Tanaka N, Iwagaki H, Taniguchi M, Fuchimoto S, Mashita K, Kimura H, Ishikawa S, Konaga E, Takeuchi H, Mizuno A, Kinoshita H, Morimoto K, Sueda T, Takesue Y, Fujimoto M, Yokoyama T, Hiyama E, Tanimura H, Ikeda S, Yasunami Y, Yamaue H, Ohnishi H, Suzuki Y. Bacteria isolated from surgical infections and its susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents-special references to bacteria isolated between April 2002 and March 2003. Jpn J Antibiot. 2004 Feb;57(1):33-69.
3.    Webster J, Osborne S. Meta-analysis of preoperative antiseptic bathing in the prevention of surgical site infection. Br J Surg. 2006 Nov;93(11):1335-41.
4.    Kallen AJ, Driscoll TJ, Thornton S, Olson PE, Wallace MR. Increase in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a Naval Medical Center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Mar;21(3):223-6.
5.    Werthén M, Henriksson L, Jensen PQ, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Bjarnsholt T. An in vitro model of bacterial infections in wounds and other tissues. APMIS. 2010 Feb;118(2):156-64.
6.    Chebotar IV, Maianskii AN, Konchakova ED, Lazareva AV, Chistiakova VP. Antibiotikorezistentnost' bioplenochnykh bakterii [Antibiotikorezistentnost of biofilm bacteria]. Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia. 2012;14(1):51-8.
7.    Vlasova NV. K voprosu o politike primeneniia antibiotikov v khirurgii [To a question of policy of application of antibiotics in surgery]. Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia. 2003;5(4):389-92.
8.    Gelfand BR; Kleimenov ON; Bekbergenov BM; Simonian SIu, Alekseeva EA. Vliianie ratsional'noi taktiki primeneniia antibiotikov na chuvstvitel'nost' vozbuditelei khirurgicheskoi infektsii k antibakterial'nym preparatam [Influence of rational tactics of application of antibiotics on sensitivity of originators of a surgical infection to antibacterial preparations]. Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova. 1990;145(12):84-87.
9.    Ermakova TS, Gorbunov VA, Titov LP. Vidovaia struktura i antibiotikorezistentnost' vozbuditelei gnoino-septicheskikh infektsii [Specific structure and antibiotikorezistentnost of originators it is purulent - septic infections]. Zdravookhranenie. 2011;(10):16-25.
10.    Barbosa TM, Levy SB. The impact of antibiotic use on resistance development and persistence. Drug Resist Updat. 2000 Oct;3(5):303-311.
11.    Desrosiers M, Bendouah Z, Barbeau J. Effectiveness of topical antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):149-53.
12.    Kapil A. The challenge of antibiotic resistance: need to contemplate. Indian J Med Res. 2005 Feb;121(2):83-91.
13.    Levy SB. Antibiotic and antiseptic resistance: impact on public health / S. B. Levy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Oct;19(10):120-2.
14.    Levy SB. Antibiotic resistance: an ecological imbalance. The book: Antibiotic resistance: Origins, Evolution, Selection and Spread. West Sussex, England: Wiley Chichester; 1997. р. 1-14.

Поиск по сайту