Menu

A+ A A-

Download article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2016.3.18

Zimatkin S.M., Markavets N.I.
Comparative anatomy of the liver and bile ducts of humans and rats
Educational Establishment «Grodno State Medical University», Grodno, Republic of Belarus

Vestnik VGMU. 2016;15(3):18-23.

Abstract.
This review is devoted to the comparative analysis of anatomy of the liver and biliary tract of human beings and rats, as well as the determination of the specificity of their organohistogenesis. In the morphogenesis of the liver and biliary tract in rats during their prenatal development the formation periods similar to those in the human body take place which are continuously passing one into another. Despite the relatively large mass of the liver, the greater number of hepatic lobules and the absence of the gallbladder in rats show that microscopic organization of the liver and cytophysiological hepatocytes peculiarities of rats and human beings do not differ fundamentally. The review presents data demonstrating the homology of the liver and biliary tract of human beings and rats, which is the basis for extrapolation of the results of the experimental studies on laboratory rats onto humans.
Key words: liver, bile ducts, gallbladder, rat.

References

1. Babak OYa. Sindrom kholestaza: chto nuzhno znat’ kazhdomu vrachu [Cholestasia syndrome: what each doctor needs to know]. Ukr Terapevt Zhurn. 2005;(3):4-22.
2. Vovk EI. Zhelchnokamennaia bolezn’ v KhKhI veke: chto novogo? [Cloelithiasis in the XXI century: any news?] Lechashchii Vrach. 2011;(2):58-65.
3. Konikoff F. Gallstones – approach to medical management. Med Gen Med. 2003 Oct;5(4):8.
4. Lammert F, Marschall HU, Glantz A, Matern S. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Hepatol. 2000 Dec;33(6):1012-21.
5. Lichtenstein D. Hepatobiliary complications of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):495-505.
6. Maksimova LA, Zaltsmane VK, Kartashova OYa, Mayore AYa, Saldava LA, Sondore VYa, Raytsic AB. Prigodnost’ nekotorykh vidov laboratornykh zhivotnykh dlia modelirovaniia kholestaticheskikh porazhenii pecheni [Suitability of some species of laboratory animals for modeling of cholestatic lesions of a liver]. V: Laboratornye zhivotnye v meditsinskikh issledovaniiakh: tez dokl konf 3–4 okt 1974 g. Moscow, RF; 1974. Р. 142-4.
7. Zapadnyuk IP, Zapadnyuk VI, Zakhariya EA, Zapadnyuk BV. Laboratornye zhivotnye. Razvedenie, soderzhanie, ispol’zovanie v eksperimente [Laboratory animals. Delution, maintenance, use in experiment]. Kiev, Ukraine: Vishcha shkola. Golovnoe izd-vo; 1983. 383 р.
8. Dzidziguri DV, Bakuradze ED, Kakhidze IG, Megrelishvili GZ, Kordzaia DD. Regeneratsiia pecheni belykh krys pri kholestaze [Neogenesis of a liver of white rats at a cholestasia]. Tsitologiia. 2004;46(5):411-5.
9. Karkishchenko NN, Grachev SV, red. Rukovodstvo po laboratornym zhivotnym i al’ternativnym modeliam v biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiiakh [The guide to laboratory animals and alternative models in biomedical technologies]. Moscow, RF: Profil’-2S; 2010. 358 р.
10. Danilov K, red. Rukovodstvo po gistologii [Guide to a histology]: v 2 t. T. 2. Saint-Petersburg, RF: SpetsLit; 2011. 512 р.
11. Verin VK. Differentsirovka gepatotsitov i kholangiotsitov v embrional’nom i postnatal’nom periode ontogeneza krys [Differentiation of hepatocytes and holangiotsit in the fetal and post-natal period of an ontogenesis of rats]. Arkhiv Anatomii Gistologii Embriologii. 1982;82(2):106-14.
12. Nikityuk BA, Chtetsova VP. Morfologiia cheloveka [Morphology of the person]: ucheb posobie. 2-e izd. Moscow, RF: Izd-vo MGU; 1990. 344 р.
13. Afanasyev YuI, Yurina NA, red. Gistologiia, tsitologiia i embriologiia [Histology, cytology and fetology]: ucheb dlia studentov med vuzov. Moscow, RF: Meditsina; 2002. 744 р.
14. Nozdrachev AD, Polyakov EL. Anatomiia krysy (Laboratornye zhivotnye) [Anatomy of a rat (Laboratory animals)]. Saint-Petersburg, RF: Lan’; 2001. 464 р.
15. Aller MA, Arias JL, García-Domínguez J, Arias JI, Durán M, Arias J. Experimental obstructive cholestasis: the wound-like inflammatory liver response. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2008 Nov;1(1):6.
16. Leontyuk AS, Sluka BA. Osnovy vozrastnoi gistologii [Fundamentals of age histology]: ucheb posobie. Minsk, RB: Vysh shk; 2000. 416 р.
17. Zufarov KA, Sadriddinov AF. Strukturnye osobennosti pecheni pri narushenii ee ekskretornoi funktsii [Structural features of a liver at disturbance of its excretory function]. Morfologiia. 1993;105(10):81.
18. Prives MG, Lysenkov NK, Bushkovich VI. Anatomiia cheloveka [Human anatomy]. Saint-Petersburg, RF: Izdatel’skii dom SPbMAPO; 2006. 720 р.
19. Esteller A. Physiology of bile secretion. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;14(37):5641-9.
20. Wang D Q-H, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Portincasa P. The billiary system. Florida, US: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; 2012. 156 р.
21. Ivanchenkova RA, Gatsenko VP, Atkova ER. Geneticheskie aspekty zhelcheobrazovaniia [Genetic aspects of biliation]. Eksperim Klin Gastroenterologiia. 2009;(3):56-63.
22. Flörkemeier V. Cholestatic Liver Disease. Freinburg: Dr Falk Pharma GmbH; 2006. 112 p.
23. Gambaryan PP, Dukelskaya NM. Krysa [Rat]: ucheb posobie dlia un-tov. Moscow, RF: Sovet nauka; 1955. 255 р.
24. Mogilevets EV, Garelik PV, Zimatkin SM, Anufrik SS, Prokopchik NI. Morfologiia pecheni pri CCl4-indutsirovannom tsirroze pod vliianiem fotodinamicheskoi terapii [Liver morphology at the CCl4-induced cirrhosis under the influence of photodynamic therapy]. Problemy Zdorov’ia Ekologii. 2015;(1):71-5.
25. Lebedeva EI, Myadelets OD. Sravnitel’naia morfofunktsional’naia kharakteristika pecheni belykh krys i cheloveka pri alkogol’nom tsirroze [The comparative morfofunktsionalny characteristic of a liver of white rats and the person at an alcoholic cirrhosis]. Novosti Med-Biol Nauk. 2015;12(3):97-106.
26. Usynin IF. Adaptivnaia rol’ funktsional’noi geterogennosti gepatotsitov [Adaptive role of functional heterogeneity of hepatocytes]. Biul SO RAMN. 2007;(5):17-23.
27. Malarkey DE, Johnson K, Ryan L, Boorman G, Maronpot RR. New insights into functional aspects of liver morphology. Toxicol Pathol. 2005;33(1):27-34.
28. Lebedeva EI, Myadelets OD, Prudnikov VS. Morfofunktsional’naia kharakteristika pecheni belykh krys v norme [The Morfofunktsionalny characteristic of a liver of white rats is normal]. Uchen Zap Viteb Ordena Znak Pocheta Gos Akad Veterinar Meditsiny. 2015;51(vyp 1, ch 1):80-3.
29. Serov VV, Paukov VS. Ul’trastrukturnaia patologiia [Ultrastructural pathology]. Moscow, RF: Meditsina; 1975. 432 р.
Khem A, Kormak D. Gistologiia [Histology]: v 5 t. Moscow, RF: Mir; 1983. T 4. 245 р.

Information about authors:
Zimatkin S.M. – Doctor of Biological Sciences, professor, head of the Chair of Histology, Cytology & Embryology, Educational Establishment «Grodno State Medical University»;
Markovets N.I. – teacher of the Chair of Histology, Cytology & Embryology, Educational Establishment «Grodno State Medical University».

Correspondence address: Republic of Belarus, 230009, Grodno, 80 Gorky str., Educational Establishment «Grodno State Medical University», Chair of Histology, Cytology & Embryology. E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. – Zimatkin S.M.

Поиск по сайту