Menu

A+ A A-

Download article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2022.4.59

Y.I. Yarets1,2, I.A. Slavnikov2,3
The use of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the microbiota of acute wounds for a differentiated approach to the preoperative preparation tactics choice for autodermoplasty
1Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel, Republic of Belarus
2Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, Republic of Belarus
3The 1st Gomel City Clinical Hospital, Gomel, Republic of Belarus

Vestnik VGMU. 2022;21(4):59-69.

Abstract.
Objectives. To evaluate the possibility of using qualitative and quantitative indicators of microbiological examination of wound discharge to determine a differentiated approach to the choice of tactics for preparing acute wounds for skin grafting (SG).
Material and methods. Qualitative and quantitative indicators of microbiological examination of swabs from acute wounds of 176 patients (wound duration up to 21 days), that was performed in the dynamics of the use of various methods of wound treatment, were analyzed.
Results. The absence of clinical signs of inflammation, a negative culture result substantiated the possibility of performing SG in 23.8% of patients (n=42) after only conservative preparation. The presence of E. faecalis, coagulase-negative staphylococci in wounds determines the possibility of using mechanical debridement in 48.9% of patients (n=86), the effectiveness of which was proved by the successful outcome of SG. Isolation from wounds of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis in the amount of >105 CFU/ml is an indication for the use of ultrasonic and mechanical debridement. Combined debridement was more often performed for wounds lasting from 11 to 21 days (42% vs 20.6% and 21.7% for wounds lasting 5-10 days and up to 4 days, χ2=6.48; p=0.01 ). The skin graft failure (5.1% of patients, n=9) determined the need to take into account isolates of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, isolated in the amount of ≤105 CFU/ml.
Conclusions. When determining the procedure for acute wound preparation, it is necessary to take into consideration not only the presence of clinical signs of inflammation, but also the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the microbiota. Pheno- and genotypic markers reflecting the pathogenic potential of the isolates are additional criteria for choosing the wound debridement method.
Keywords: acute wound, microbiological culture, interpretation of results, pathogenic potential, wound debridement, skin grafting.

Funding: The research was carried out within the frames of the Grant of the President of the Republic of Belarus in healthcare (letter of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Belarus dated January 20, 2018 №14-12/896) and within the frames of the task of the State Research Program (GPNI) 4 for 2021 – 2025 on the theme “3.20 The study of pathogenic potential of clinically significant bacteria strains to increase the efficiency of infection control system in hospitals”.

References

1. Gelfanda BR, Kozlova RS, Kubyshkina VA, Khachatriana NN, red. Surgical skin and soft tissue infections. Russian national guidelines. 2-e pererab i dop. izd. Moscow, RF; 2015. 109 р. Available from: http://nasci.ru/?id=3392&download=1. [Accessed 29th Jule 2022]. (In Russ.)
2. Angel D, Swanson T, Sussman G, Shultz G, Ousey K, Keast D, et al. IWII: Wound infection in clinical practice. Available from: https://www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/iwii-wound-infection-clinical-practice. [Accessed 29th Jule 2022].
3. Kallstrom G. Are Quantitative Bacterial Wound Cultures Useful? J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Aug;52(8):2753-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00522-14
4. Clinical protocol for diagnosis and treatment of patients with surgical skin and soft tissue infections in the outpatient setting: pril k prikazu M-va zdravookhraneniya Resp Belarus', 28 iyunya 2013 g, № 749. V: Gos kom po standartizatsii Resp Belarus'. Natsional'nyi fond tekhnicheskikh normativnykh pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus'. Available from: https://tnpa.by/#!/DocumentCard/420062/550762. [Accessed 29th Jule 2022]. (In Russ.)
5. Mitish VA, Paskhalova IuS, Munos Sepeda PA, Ushakov AA, Blatun LA, Borisov IV, i dr. Ultrasonic cavitation in the treatment of neuroischemic form of diabetic foot syndrome in the presence of biofilm forms of bacteria (literature review). Rany Ranevye Infektsii Zhurn im prof BM Kostyuchenka. 2020;7(3):20-30. (In Russ.) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25199/2408-9613-2020-7-3-20-31
6. Maksimova NV, Liundup A, Liubimov RO, Galina A, Nikolenko VN. Pathophysiological aspects of the wound healing process in normal and diabetic foot syndrome. Vestn RAMN. 2014;69(11-12):110-7. (In Russ.) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15690/vramn.v69i11-12.1192
7. Yarets YuI, Shevchenko NI, Eremin VF. Methodology of microbiological culture of wound discharge within the framework of modern concepts of infectious process diagnosis. Laborator Sluzhba. 2021;10(3):33-42. (In Russ.) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/labs20211003133
8. Dinesh K, Karthick M. A study on ESKAPE pathogens the bad bug with no drug. Tropical J Pathol Microbiol. 2018 Apr-Jun;4(2):134-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2018.i02.02
9. Rozhko AV, Yarets YuI, Shevchenko NI; Resp nauch-prakt tsentr radiatsion meditsiny i ekologii cheloveka. Method of microbiological diagnosis of posttraumatic wound infection: instruktsiya po primeneniyu № 211-1215: utv M-vom zdravookhraneniya Resp Belarus' 30.06.2016 g. Gomel, RB; 2015. 8 р. (In Russ.)
10. Determination of microbial sensitivity to antimicrobial agents: klin rekomendatsii: versiya 2018-03. Available from: https://www.antibiotic.ru/files/321/clrec-dsma2018.pdf. [Accessed 29th Jule 2022]. (In Russ.)
11. Evrop kom po opredeleniyu chuvstvitel'nosti k antimikrob preparatam. Tables of boundary values for the interpretation of IPC values and diameters of growth suppression zones: versiya 10.0, deistvuet s 01.01.2020. Available from: https://iacmac.ru/ru/docs/eucast/eucast-clinical-breakpoints-bacteria-10.0-rus.pdf. [Accessed 29th Jule 2022].
12. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, Campanile F, Amicosante G, Perilli MG, et al. Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Dec;10(12):1081-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.x
13. Zheng J-X, Wu Y, Lin Z-W, Pu Z-Y, Yao W-M, Chen Z, et al. Characteristics of and Virulence Factors Associated with Biofilm Formation in Clinical Enterococcus faecalis Isolates in China. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov;8:2338. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02338
14. Hashem YA, Amin HM, Essam TM, Yassin AS, Aziz RK. Biofilm formation in enterococci: genotype-phenotype correlations and inhibition by vancomycin. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul;7(1):5733. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05901-0
15. Hemati S, Azizi-Jalilian F, Pakzad I, Taherikalani M, Maleki A, Karimi S, et al. The correlation between the presence of quorum sensing, toxin-antitoxin system genes and MIC values with ability of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iran J Microbiol. 2014 Jun;6(3):133-9.
16. Selasi GN, Nicholas A, Jeon H, Na SH, Kwon HI, Kim YJ, et al. Differences in biofilm mass, expression of biofilm-associated genes, and resistance to desiccation between epidemic and sporadic clones of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii sequence type 191. PLoS One. 2016 Sep;11(9):e0162576. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162576
17. Fazli M, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jørgensen B, Andersen AS, Krogfelt KA, et al. Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Dec;47(12):4084-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01395-09

Information about authors:
Y.I. Yarets – Candidate of Medical Sciences, associate professor, head of the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory, Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-5079
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. – Yuliya I. Yarets;
I.A. Slavnikov – Candidate of Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Chair of Surgical Diseases No. 2, Gomel State Medical University, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-4090

Поиск по сайту