DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2023.1.9
S.I. Pimanov1, V.S. Kaportseva1, N.A. Mikhailova2, E.V. Vergasova2
Confounding factors in ultrasound liver elastography. Part 1. General provisions and methodological errors
1Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University, Vitebsk, Republic of Belarus
2LLC «LODE», Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Vestnik VGMU. 2023;22(1):9-18.
Abstract.
The aim of the study is a systematic analysis of literature data on the effect of methodological factors, artifacts, as well as external influences and features of the state of the organism on the results of ultrasonic elastography of the liver. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography is a highly accurate method for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis, provided that the study methodology is strictly followed, however, the influence of measurement disturbances should be taken into account. Confounding factors lead to an erroneous change in the liver stiffness from insignificant, within 5-10%, to considerable, catastrophically distorting the assessment of the degree of liver fibrosis. Confounding factors include three main groups: 1) methodologically determined, as well as physical artifacts and equipment features; 2) internal (endogenous) and 3) external (exogenous). The first group of confounding factors includes: non-observance by the operator of the standard rules for manipulating the probe, positional features of the patient, insufficient size of the window area of the area of interest, incorrect location of the area of interest, lack of adequate breath holding by the patient or the performing of his/her movements, insufficient number of measurements, large spread of recorded values, transmission pulsations from the heart and large vessels, features of the equipment used, physical essence of the elastographic method and artifacts.
Keywords: ultrasound, shear wave elastography, liver fibrosis, stiffness, Young’s modulus, liver.
References
1. Lim JK, Flamm SL, Singh S, Falck-Ytter YT. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Role of Elastography in the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2017 May;152(6):1536-43. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.017
2. Pimanov SI, Mitkova MD, Mitkov VV. Factors influencing the results of ultrasound elastometry of the liver. Ul’trazvukovaja Funkcion Diagnostika. 2021;(4):9-29. (In Russ.)
3. Mitkov VV, Mitkova MD. Ultrasonic shear wave elastography. Ul’trazvukovaja Funkcion Diagnostika. 2015;(2):94-108. (In Russ.)
4. Acar S, Millar E, Mitkova M, Mitkov V. Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Ultrasound. 2016 Nov;24(4):205-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X16673677
5. Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, Goodman ZD, Garcia-Tsao G, Rubin J, Garra B, et al. Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):845-61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150619
6. Myers RP, Fong A, Shaheen AA. Utilization rates, complications and costs of percutaneous liver biopsy: a population-based study including 4275 biopsies. Liver Int. 2008 May;28(5):705-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01691.x
7. Barr RG. Shear wave liver elastography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Apr;43(4):800-807. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1375-1
8. Yao T-T, Pan J, Qian J-D, Cheng H, Wang Y, Wang G-Q. Shear wave elastography may be sensitive and more precise than transient elastography in predicting significant fibrosis. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 6;8(17):3730-3742. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3730
9. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas J-M, Gilja OH, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013 Jun;34(3):238-53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1335375
10. Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall Med. 2017 Aug;38(4):e16-e47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103952
11. Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D, Garcia-Tsao G, Ferraioli G. Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement. Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):263-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192437
12. Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L, Choi BI, Sporea I, Wilson SR, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 May;41(5):1161-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.007
13. Ferraioli G, Wai-Sun Wong V, Castera L, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Dietrich CF, et al. Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Dec;44(12):2419-2440. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.008
14. Ferraioli G. Review of Liver Elastography Guidelines. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jan;38(1):9-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.14856
15. Bâldea V, Bende F, Popescu A, Șirli R, Sporea I. Comparative study between two 2D-Shear Waves Elastography techniques for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Med Ultrason. 2021 Aug;23(3):257-264. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu-2863
16. Petzold G, Grieme B, Bremer SC, Knoop RF, Goetze RG, Ellenrieder V, et al. Prospective comparison of 2D-shearwave elastography in both liver lobes in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1138-1145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2019.1653961
17. Naganuma H, Ishida H, Uno A, Nagai H, Kuroda H, Ogawa M. Diagnostic problems in two-dimensional shear wave elastography of the liver. World J Radiol. 2020 May 28;12(5):76-86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v12.i5.76
18. Bouchet P, Gennisson J-L, Podda A, Alilet M, Carrié M, Aubry S. Artifacts and Technical Restrictions in 2D Shear Wave Elastography. Ultraschall Med. 2020 Jun;41(3):267-277. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0805-1099
19. Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, Mackey JE, Miller FH, Yeh BM, et al. Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2016 Nov-Dec;36(7):1987-2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016160042
20. Zelesco M, Abbott S, O’Hara S. Pitfalls and sources of variability in two dimensional shear wave elastography of the liver: An overview. Sonography. 2018 Mar;5(1):20-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sono.12132
21. Dubinsky TJ, Shah HU, Erpelding TN, Sannananja B, Sonneborn R, Zhang M. Propagation Imaging in the Demonstration of Common Shear Wave Artifacts. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jun;38(6):1611-1616. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.14840
22. Park SH, Kim SY, Suh CH, Lee SS, Kim KW, Lee SJ, et al. What we need to know when performing and interpreting US elastography. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;22(3):406-414. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0106
23. Goertz RS, Egger C, Neurath MF, Strobel D. Impact of food intake, ultrasound transducer, breathing maneuvers and body position on acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry of the liver. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):380-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1312816
24. Dong Y, Sirli R, Ferraioli G, Sporea I, Chiorean L, Cui X, et al. Shear wave elastography of the liver - review on normal values. Z Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;55(2):153-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117226
25. Ling W, Lu Q, Quan J, Ma L, Luo Y. Assessment of impact factors on shear wave based liver stiffness measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):335-41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.004
26. Pimanov SI. Ultrasound diagnostics in gastroenterology. Moscow, RF: Prakt medicina; 2016. 416 р. (In Russ.)
27. Dietrich CF, ed; Sporea I, Friedrich-Rust M, Gilja OH, Bota S, Șirli R. Liver elastography EFSUMB Course Book. 2nd ed. Available from: https://efsumb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ECBCh03_liver_Elastography_FREE.pdf. [Accessed 24th January 2023].
28. Pimanov SI, Sychev OYu, Danilova OI. Reproducibility of ultrasonic shear-wave elastography results. Luchevaja Diagnostika Terapija. 2019;(S1):151-2. (In Russ.)
29. Sychev OYu, Danilova OI, Mikhaylova NA, Vergasova EV, Pimanov SI. Variability of hepatic ultrasonic shear-wave elastography results in multiple measurements. Ul’trazvukovaja Funkcion Diagnostika. 2019;(3 Pril):S86. (In Russ.)
Information about authors:
S.I. Pimanov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor, head of the Chair of Internal Diseases & Ultrasound Diagnostics of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining, Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University,
e-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. – Sergey I. Pimanov;
V.S. Kaportseva – lecturer of the Chair of Internal Diseases & Ultrasound Diagnostics of the Faculty for Advanced Training & Retraining, Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University;
N.A. Mikhailova – Candidate of Medical Sciences, ultrasound doctor, LLC “LODE”;
E.V. Vergasova – Candidate of Medical Sciences, head of the department of ultrasound diagnostics, LLC “LODE”.
