Menu

A+ A A-

Download article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2016.2.93

Shakavets N.V.
The results of three-year dental caries prevention in early childhood
Educational Establishment «Belarusian State Medical University», Minsk, Republic of Belarus

Vestnik VGMU. 2016;15(2):93-101.

Abstract.
Objectives. To comparatively estimate the effectiveness of various methods of early childhood caries (ECC) prevention.
Material and methods. All in all 642 children at the age of 6-36 months were examined. The d1-4mft and d1-4mfs indices, the indices of oral hygiene, the level of CFU of SM in the saliva were determined. All children were randomized into 7 groups. In the 1st group mothers’ motivating interview and dental examination of the infants 2 times a year (n=129) were conducted. In the 2nd group fluoride varnish applications (5% NaF) 2 times a year (n=123) were made and in the 3rd group – 4 times a year (n=124). The control, the 7th group was made up of 163 children. The children with SM in the number of CFU>103 were randomized into two groups – the 4th group (n=52) with the applications of «Cervitec» varnish 4 times a year and the 5th group (n=51) with the applications of «Cervitec» varnish 2 times a year and fluoride varnish applications (5% NaF) 2 times a year. The children with SM CFU>103 out of the 7th group made up the group 8 – the comparison group (n=31). All the data were  statistically analyzed with the use of non-parametric methods (Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation analysis).  
Results. The increasing of dental caries intensity during three years was 1,82 teeth in the group 1; 0,95 in the group 2; 0,54 in the group 3; in the group 7 – 2,50 (р1-7=0,18; р2-7<0,001; р3-7<0,001). There were no significant statistical differences between the group 2 and the group 3 (р=0,21). The increasing of dental caries intensity in the group 4 was 2,04, in the group 5 - 1,35 and in the group 8 - 3,30 (р4-8=0,12; р5-8=0,001).
Conclusions. The applications of fluoride varnish 2 times a year are clinically and economically effective for ECC prevention. The dental caries reduction is 62%. The combined preventive strategy of using high concentrated fluorides and chlorhexidine applications is effective for ECC prevention in children with high caries risk. It allows to achieve 59,1% of the dental caries reduction in this group.
Key words: dental caries, infants, fluoride varnish, reduction.

References

1. Petersen PE. Improvement of global oral health - the leadership role of the World Health Organization. Community Dent Health. 2010 Dec;27(4):194-8.
2. Wyne AH. Early childhood caries: nomenclature and case definition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;27(5):313-5.
3. Ramos-Gomez FJ, Weintraub JA, Gansky SA, Hoover CI, Featherstone JD. Bacterial, behavioral and environmental factors associated with early childhood caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002 Winter;26(2):165-73.
4. Ge Y, Caufield PW, Fisch GS, Li Y. Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis colonization correlated with caries experience in children. Caries Res. 2008;42(6):444-8.
5. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classification, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):40-3.
6. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Professionally applied topical fluoride: Evidence-based clinical recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Aug;137(8):1151-9.
7. Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M. Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jan;26(5):493-510.
8. Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD, Hodgson RJ, Visser JM. Effects of glucose and fluoride on competition and metabolism within in vitro dental bacterial communities and biofilms. Caries Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;36(2):81-6.
9. Adair SM. Evidence-based use of fluoride in contemporary pediatric dental practice. Pediatr Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):133-42.
10. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O. Assessing the stage of caries lesion activity on the basis of clinical and microbiological examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;25(1):69-75.
11. Kuzmina EM. Profilaktika stomatologicheskikh zabolevanii [Prophylaxis of stomatologic diseases]: ucheb posobie. Moscow, RF; 2003. 214 р.
12. Ribeiro AA, Portela M, Souza IP. Relation between biofilm, caries activity and gingivitis in HIV+ children. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2002 Apr-Jun;16(2):144-50.
13. Leus PA, Mikhaylov AS, Borisenko LG. Nekotorye metody prognozirovaniia kariesa i indeksnoi diagnostiki boleznei parodonta [Some methods of forecasting of caries and index diagnostics of illnesses of a parodont]: metod rek dlia studentov-stomatologov. Minsk, RB; 1992. 57 р.
14. Bіdenko NV; zaiavnik і vlasnik patentu Nats med un-t іm. OO Bogomol'tsia. Sposіb viznachennia rіvnia іntensivnostі karієsu timchasovikh zubіv [Way of determination of level of intensity of caries of temporary teeth]: pat 19012 Ukraїna: MPK A61S 5/00. u200607926; zaiavl 14.07.06; opubl 15.11.06, Biul № 11.
15. Weinstein P, Harrison R, Benton T. Motivating mothers to prevent caries: confirming the beneficial effect of counseling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jun;137(6):789-93.

Поиск по сайту